Hi-REST , Lo-REST didn't we already decide this?

I've seen a number of posts, videos, and now a conference talk abstract talking about Lo-REST versus Hi-REST

I thought this was already a closed issue

See Dare's post

There isn't anything that is "Lo-REST", there are services that follow the constraints of the REST architectural style, and those that don't (sometimes those that don't have a good reason not to)

Some of this seems to revolve around some clients not supporting all verbs, this is easily fixed with the X-HTTP-Method-Override HTTP header

My next post hopefully will show how easy this is to implement using WCF extensibility.

REST       Comments [0]